On 4/12/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > You're probably right about that. What does everyone think about > > this? My thoughts are that pointing to the Wiki is good for stopgap > > solutions like suggesting upgrading a version. However, if the book > > was to be released, we'd want to put that information on the Locale > > Related Issues so that information was contained within the book. > > Which of the following types of notes are considered stopgap solutions? What's > the proper place for each one in the released book (one of: the main package > page, Locale-Related Issues page, Wiki)?
My fault. I misworded that entirely. I believe that as many fixes as possible should go in the released book. Whether this is in the application page or Locale Issues page can be decided. Since we are editing the SVN book right now, it makes sense to put the fixes in the Wiki. However, when a released book is made, I believe it should be as contained as possible. To answer your question about specifics, I don't know which ones are stopgap solutions. That was a poor choice of words. All of the situations you described in the previous mail sound important enough to me to be in the book when it is released. So, I'll rephrase my suggestion. I think that all of the Locale Related Issues should be addressed in the Wiki until we begin release planning. At that time, I believe all of these issues should be addressed in the book. That can be on the application's page or in the Locale Related Issues page. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
