Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/28/06 20:40 CST: > >> Based on this analysis, I am in favor of eliminating the sed completely. >> Its one of those legacy things that has developed a life of its own for >> no documented reason. > > I'm not sure you understand what the tclConfig.sh program does. > It is crucial to almost every package that uses Tcl. > > Unless you are certain, and 100% sure in what you are doing, you > should not remove that sed. Again, 100% certain in what you are > doing. 99.9% won't get it.
Exactly. I am *not* 100% sure what is in the book is correct. In fact I am less than 50% sure. The more I research this, the more I think that this should be a basic CMMI package. We should just fundamentally use the LFS Chapter 5 instructions: cd unix ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-threads make make install make install-private-headers ln -sv tclsh8.4 /tools/bin/tclsh Nothing more unless we can positively establish a need. At least they say that the private headers are needed for expect. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
