On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:03:51PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > If you really want to have both fonts, please swap them (i.e.: Bitstream > should come first, otherwise it would never be used if not explicitly asked > for).
That was my point. If you want bitstream, ask for it. Otherwise, here's a prettier dejavu font. :) > So, Bitstream fonts are needed only for broken applications that > explicitly ask for them. Looks like another good reason to not clobber bitstream. > Thus, the replacement happens only in three-tab lines. Well, that simplifies things. :) > As for the "after Kochi" placement, it's a hack. The real intention for the > LiveCD is "before any other Chinese fonts". Hack it may be, but unless upstream changes the order of fonts in fonts.conf, then it's a legitimate configuration step. Thanks for the heads up, Alex! -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
