Jim Gifford wrote these words on 01/11/07 16:04 CST: > Bruce, > We are all part of LFS, the only reason I put in that notice was to > let people know not to copy your material. Essentially we were told by > BLFS that you would not support multilib and other architectures, we > took care of it with an open project. We have been going through and > been removing descriptions, you guys are welcome to come in and update > and remove the offending descriptions.
Jim, you are not understanding the situation. We're not asking you to remove anything, we're asking you to provide attribution for the work you are copying. Look, you forked the project. That's cool. However, in doing so you are *obligated* by copyright license to provide attribution on material that is not original. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 16:12:02 up 1 day, 16:26, 1 user, load average: 2.03, 1.19, 0.64 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
