Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote these words on 01/11/07 16:48 CST:
>
>
>> Randy, we already do.
>>
>
> Jim, it is not worth haggling over. I simply mentioned this earlier
> as a matter of principle. Your attribution does not adhere to the
> BLFS license, but so what.
>
> If you don't want to give attribution to the BLFS team in a prominent
> spot, so be it. But, as Bruce mentioned, some links to the BLFS book,
> and proper credit would be appreciated. And, again as Bruce noted,
> it is all on a Wiki, so anyone should be able to update it as they
> see fit.
>
>
Randy,
I want to understand what you want here. BLFS is part of LFS, we
represent the LFS license and the BLFS license in our books saying that
we are adapted from that. If you feel you need more representation, show
me what you want. I don't have a problem with adding it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
