Dan Nicholson wrote: > I'm proposing that we should update packages that have patchlevel > releases (third number) in the same cycle. We're missing out on some > key bug fixes and forced to carry around patches for a bunch of > packages with the current policy.
Seems OK to me, but I wonder about the churn. How fast are these packages being updated? I suspect that a group of these patchlevel updates should be implemented together, not necessarily as each one becomes available. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
