Hi all, Something that has been on my mind for a while, and just now getting around to mentioning it in a public forum.
I'd like to mention the CLFS project in BLFS. Specifically, the part of CLFS that has to do with the BLFS packages. Some questions: 1. Where in the book should it be mentioned that CLFS can be a valuable resource? 2. How do we refer to CLFS (sister-project, similar project, fork, etc.) 3. Do others agree with me that CLFS is worth mentioning (especially reflecting that CLFS includes stuff for multilib and X64 builds). I realize we (BLFS staff) are not prepared to support multilib installations right now. But I do think CLFS should somehow, somewhere be mentioned in the BLFS book. I'd appreciate thoughts from anyone that may have any. The release of 6.2.0 is imminent and if we're going to do something to include a mention of CLFS, we need to figure out *what* we should do, and *where* it should be in the book. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 19:02:00 up 10 days, 19:16, 1 user, load average: 0.93, 0.39, 0.21 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
