Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 01/31/07 18:56 CST:
> 
>> Not having done a BLFS release before, and there appears to be no
>> information in the Editor's Guide or elsewhere (I realize Bruce
>> has a personal checklist), I'm sort of winging it as I go. Because
>> the 6.2.0 release will be (hopefully) updated to a 6.2.1 release,
>> I'm thinking the best way to go is as follows:
> 
> I've realized that there are a few other minor details required.
> Justin's help is critical.
> 
> 1) Justin needs to create and populate a 6.2.0 version on the master
> package server. I'll use this for all the rc-1 versions as well. It
> may mean duplicate updates for Justin for the next couple of weeks,
> but since there's package freeze, perhaps there won't be anything
> for Justin to do other than create the 6.2.0 dir structure and
> populate it one time.
> 
> 2) Need to populate a 6.2.0 patches repo on quantum.*

My script on quantum does that.

> 3) Need to create an Errata page (even if it is empty, we need the
> placeholder).
> 
> 4) Need to create the "Download" area for 6.2.0.*

My script does that too.

> * I need to look and see why we have separate "download" and "patches"
> directories identified in general.ent and see if they can't be
> consolidated. I didn't look, but I remember the "download" area
> contains the patches, so why do we need a separate (and redundant)
> place for the patches.

They point to the same place now via a symbolic link:

blfs/downloads/svn -> ../../patches/blfs/svn

It came about as the automation of the patches was implemented.  We
could change the book.  The only place the  downloads-root entity is
used is one place in general.ent.

  -- Bruce


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to