On Thu, Feb 15, at 01:05 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 2/15/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, saying 269KB is a bit too much accuracy, in my opinion. :-) > > Probably. > > > How about we do like the SBUs are done? If the build size is less than > > 1MB, then we put "less than 1MB". Of course, if it is anything more > > than 500K, I could easily go with 1MB. > > "less than 1MB" is OK with me. >
I believe first we should know -and by the way,we should mention in the Book - what we mean by "Build size". If I remember correctly by the last emails about the matter,some editors include into the build size,the tarball size and the logs,which sounds logical (although we don't have any instructions in the Book to create log files from the build procedure). And secondly,I noticed some people using df -k as described in the editor's book and some (our chief included) using du -skx,which these ways produce a difference. Some kind of unification is needed,although the matter is minor. Other than that I will agree with Bruce. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
