On Thu, Mar 15, at 07:15 Dan Nicholson wrote: > > You read my mind :) To the point where I was reading the post and I > couldn't tell if some parts had actually been written by me and were a > forward. Even though I'd never actually written those things.
I am running a cronjob for Mind Rsync'ing' overnight to Seattle. > > It's early here and this tea is not cutting it. Time to switch up to coffee. > Here is my preference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchidaceae > > Yes. What we're doing with ash is ugly. Taking a vaporware tarball off > of a slackware mirror and then applying a monster patch to it. > Agree. > > Dan or anyone else, feel free to make your adjustments to the patch, > > I will be grateful to correct any mistakes. > > +1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash > part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added > regardless. > > Will you just get some commit privileges already? I can't keep up with > all your patches. Thanks for the confidence, I still believe that is too early for that, but it seems that you all _urgently_ seeking for someone to break the tree. And great god, look at the revision. =================================================================== --- general.ent (revision 6666) I think I will be gladly accept to be the 6667. :) If there isn't any objection (from users or developers) until next morning for me, then I will happily break in some thousands of pieces the tree. I think I'll go for a mountain walk. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
