Dan Nicholson wrote:
> +1. Patch looks good to me. I'm curious to hear about the dropping Ash
> part of the equation from others, but I think Dash could be added
> regardless.
I don't have any objections to dropping ash for dash, but I think that
should be Randy's call.
Personally, I don't use either and don't really see the need for either
unless you are trying to build a bootable floppy. With today's
hardware, does 1.1M really make a difference?
My biggest objection to {,d}ash is that it doesn't use readline. That
makes it infeasible (for me) to use interactively. Additionally, I like
the extra flexibility of the bash extensions for scripts.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
