Randy McMurchy wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > >> I like the text you've added, but I'm not sure about /usr/X11R7 yet. > > I also do not think we should hard-code /usr/X11R7. It should perhaps > be suggested, but inside replaceable tags.
I am in favor of /usr/X11 as a generic location with compatibility symlinks as necessary. As far as the FHS standard goes, I looked around a bit to see if there is any discussion about he topic. The latest version of FHS was released January 29, 2004. That's 3.5 years ago. The so-called mailing list is nothing but spam. Is the effort still alive? Under these circumstances, I feel slavish adherence to FHS is not appropriate. We can use it for input, but well reasoned variances should not be a cause for concern. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
