Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/02/08 01:15 CST: > I am going to add (in mutt) support for header caching by enabling the > relative switch (--enable-hcache) during configuration. > > So, do we want to enable --enable-hcache by default? > Does remind you of something? Yes its the same situation with links > browser.
I would prefer that if it is the default, then BDB is used as the backend (it is already available in LFS). Otherwise it should not be the default. > If we don't enable it, please can you provide me with a sort summary of the > above, in the "--enable-hcache" option that is going to be added in the > commands explanations section? > I have difficulties to express it in well written sort English. I can help with if you like, but it doesn't need to be a big deal. Simply list the dependencies (with an explanation about BDB being already installed but not recommended for this application). Then list the option in the command explanations with a *short* sentence that says it is a good thing for IMAP support. It doesn't need to be elaborate. As far as Links goes, I believe the ticket is still open with the fact about the graphics option shouldn't be the default, so Links will be fixed before the ticket is closed. If it is decided that the graphics option can't be dropped, then we'll move Links to the Wiki and out of BLFS as it no longer fits in "text based browsers" and it is not a graphical browser in the sense that folks would expect. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 06:51:01 up 13 days, 22:36, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
