Hi all, a discussion came up regarding tcp_wrapper libs. Please refer to the comments at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2481. There are two views on the problem:
a) When a package needs libraries (even of an other package) at another location than they gets installed by default, the install procedure should move them. In the current discussion is this that the instructions of portmap should move tcp_wrappers libraries. b) When there is a package which needs other packages libraries, than the other package should install them there. In the current discussion is this that the tcp_wrapper instructions should be modified to install in /lib to satify portmaps needs when /usr is nfs-mounted. I would like to start a (little) discussion about that. What do you think - how should we handle such situations in general, and in this particular situation? -- Thomas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
