Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>   I'll take a fresh
>> look at the suggestions, and if that fails I'll copy it to Bruce.
>>
>  Found the error: even after I commented out the patch, I got a
> similar failure.  Looking at index.xml, it was pointing to the gnome
> chapter.  Odd.  Updated, to see if I'd somehow missed something -
> Richard's commit meant my changelog was in conflict - when I looked,
> the formatting was a little weird and my copy seemed to be missing
> the first tag for the day's changes (itemizedlist, I think - before
> the para).  Reverted my changelog, fixed it up, and I've got it
> rendered again.  Now I just need to make sure I've got the actual
> edit correct.

Glad you found it.  One of the drawbacks of xml is that the error 
messages don't specify where a problem lies very well.

I've run into the same problem with the changelog before.  For some 
reason it's easy to have the tags out of balance there.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to