Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> As I am reviewing BLFS tickets, I now notice that we have both GnuPG 1 and 2 >> in >> the book. >> >> I missed the discussion on this. Why do we have both? Should GnuPG 1 be >> dropped? > > No. > > They are essentially different packages with the same name. > The -2 version is much more robust including support for > S/Mime. The -1 version is still needed to support other > packages for those that don't want to build -2 and all the > dependencies. There are no conflicts when both versions are > installed.
OK, but I think that we need to add the above to GnuPG2. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
