Ken Moffat wrote: >> We could easily put in another line: >> >> Last built and tested with LFS version 6.5 >> >> immediately above or below the date stamp.
I'm not really a fan of doing anything different than what we've been doing. I'm really against a branch for 6.4, as there is simply nobody that will use it. People building LFS are going to build 6.5. If someone has 6.4, they probably have already been building packages, so they don't need the branch. Let's discuss this quite a bit more before we start adding lines such as "Last built and tested with LFS version xxx" and everything else that has been suggested. Let's just try to get trunk up to date and everything will take care of itself. Thoughts from others please. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
