Ken Moffat wrote: > As an alternative, replace "status" with 'last built against LFS version > ...." > (and show the release or svn date) - that has benefit going forward that > it indicates what might not build with a current release, or might have > outdated space and time figures.
I like this idea. We already have a line showing the last time the page was changed: Last updated on 2008-10-13 09:49:44 -0500 but this doesn't always mean that the package was tested then. Sometimes it's just a typo or other change that is made without rebuilding the package. We could easily put in another line: Last built and tested with LFS version 6.5 immediately above or below the date stamp. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
