On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:56:19PM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > That's the way we've done it for a long time.  If we want to change, there 
> > are a 
> > lot of places that need to be changed and it is probably not worth it.  The 
> > reason these tags were chosen in the first place was two fold.  The 
> > description 
> > of the tags in docbook pointed us that way and we wanted to provide a 
> > specific 
> > tag for alfs to use that indicated the difference.
> 
> My apologies, I sent an email to -dev about this subject before you sent
> yours. However, I believe it is correct to use optional, perhaps this
> tag wasn't available when it was decided to use option.

p.s., I'm quite happy to do the work myself, I can quite easily fit it
in to my schedule with the other 150 packages that need updating.

Attachment: pgpYz8xdHKiwy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to