Guy Dalziel wrote these words on 08/05/09 11:16 CST: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:56:19PM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote: >> My apologies, I sent an email to -dev about this subject before you sent >> yours. However, I believe it is correct to use optional, perhaps this >> tag wasn't available when it was decided to use option. > > p.s., I'm quite happy to do the work myself,
I'm now confused as to exactly what you're asking, Guy. Are you saying that we've not got <option>, <optional>, and <parameter> tags in the book? Or are you saying that the <optional> tags should be <option>? Could you clarify this for me? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 11:31:00 up 29 days, 23:59, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
