Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/29/09 08:39 CST:
> I will go through the book today and find all packages that have
> recommended dependencies and evaluate them. If they are not identified
> why it is recommended, I'll reply to this post. This needs to be
> cleaned up, I'll start the process.
In the Links package, we have this:
<bridgehead renderas="sect4">Recommended</bridgehead>
<para role="recommended"><xref linkend="gpm"/> (if mouse support is
desired) and
<xref linkend="openssl"/></para>
My take is that Recommended is actually wrong here. I think the proper
syntax should be:
<bridgehead renderas="sect4">Required</bridgehead>
<para role="required"><xref linkend="gpm"/> (if mouse support is
desired) and
<xref linkend="openssl"/> (if SSL support is desired)</para>
If you want the support these two dependencies provide, then the dependencies
are *required*. Let's actually use correct terminology in these types of
instances.
Please, if you disagree or have comments feel free to provide them. I'm
simply making suggestions here. I would like feedback from others.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
09:56:00 up 50 min, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.14, 0.21
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
