-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/28/2010 08:08 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
<Snip Everything> > Wadayasay? > Absolutely. We don't really have a choice as late as it is. I did mention that I was about 2 weeks late. :-) I'll stop on the additions then and get to work on the multimedia packages without pulse and then OOo. I would, however, like to revisit this process at a later time. We do not have to branch, however, branching does give us a little leeway for display. Multiple sandboxes serve the same purpose (and I have a few), but do not allow one to release for the early adopters...of course we do have home directories on quantum. But I still believe that LFS-RC means it is time to discuss package freeze and set a concrete goal for the next BLFS release. Anyway, you mentioned that you will be building Gnome. Do you intend to validate the GNOME_CONFIG suggestion in your current build, or go with what is in the book now? WRT Gnome, there are still a couple of package updates to do, some patches required if building in other than /usr, and some symlinks to create if not using a shared libexecdir. - -- DJ Lucas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLi2zDAAoJEIUM+xKzBYsI+gQP/jaXVyNH9dKazlEok/BaSfUu C/Yu6UZioRGcetoYTlHRSmDTxMiFD4bTKc4vhFNpt06Fn3/Vj3bihg1fUwaf4e2L hI+tUwM+0K8IGpqK+IRF8OqyR+EjumFcxwB8+61suh9f86Oa6W6pzRFvWXxdpMWJ QnkRNn+8vag9pAUhzD3LDGM6Ukr3GS2GNMqAwscfiAlqy4vX38Wyf8Kj/YxPBswV LlfiLvDrmifPbfYhv1c21H7n6lZv3QFbFZA3UG4BhtjhQ/mqP5dkVQzheYnUepGw EvbKq0WT3WmelupxSXeS/7r6lHyul808wLmtLw6ipH31y3rgDmqD2O8eeBFMBrFY hWJx7jUkln0qg0GeQGRtXqk2CMNfizbEidXaLK1VfKa3aNfTa5ppx0236SQmJIMi oa+MCVg724W7nudSWWw5IKxgGzaaVVd7dsNp9fNUERYs8V3DqNr9wXkPxkaN1mBR OvycdoSMGYmsbfvdXDVKIDmiCtvenw+J3488oeOh0Kdd3UiXaHihhSUGjG/TZ2Ae qvxkotvzXE9RV+eLCd/2r7kCgJuCHE4SicBfdbS/33dsqq+RPdmzaaKBqj+79D9S DXhyw6Rh3d3t3ArUs+BvaG+BGddYaD8JR4ojc3nsRawXmL06Bx/ASK2zBX2o/P04 3Fh2FWe2Q/Tw5n8nxNnT =0vjg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
