--- On Sat, 7/31/10, Randy McMurchy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active
> developers
> are using 6.5. I am open to suggestions, but I feel BLFS
> may need
> to just simply target the LFS Development book. Anybody who
> could
> contribute some alternate ideas would certainly be
> helpful.
I'm using a LFS-6.6 with BLFS-svn-20100527 and intend on sticking to LFS-6.6
until there's a kernel and/or gcc requirement. Also, I need to upgrade BLFS to
a June/July snapshot.
I think if BLFS svn monthly snapshots are archived, it'll be easier for BLFS
users to mark them stable for their purposes. I have a whole bunch of blfs
snapshots and have kinda lost track of which is which. I don't remember ever
using a BLFS stable. I agree that blfs-dev should target lfs-dev, but at the
same time dramatic changes like gcc-4.5 could easily create a patch mess for
those who can't switch to gcc-4.5 yet, but need blfs-dev for the most part.
Also I think the note on the blfs download page about a release being delayed
isn't true anymore. BLFS completely missed a release.
--
zoyd
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
