Vinay Pawar wrote: > So, when you spot a new LFS stable release and are done building it, one > would expect there to be a reasonably updated BLFS too. The current LFS-6.6 > has a good mix of glibc/gcc/kernel/etc but finding a good BLFS isn't always > easy.
Your expectations are a bit high. :-) There simply is not enough development going on with BLFS right now to *expect* it to match the current stable LFS. However, with that said, it is almost *always* best to use the most recent development BLFS with the most current stable LFS as well as the current development LFS. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
