On 09/22/2010 08:33 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > Anybody tried DB5 in place of SQLite3? > > Assuming it works as advertised, any suggestions on how to handle it in > the book?
Yeah, bad form to reply to myself. I had just heard about this...well just realized what I heard over a month ago. Anyway, it looks like it is a wholesale replacement (though you can skip the sql part and build sqlite3 separately still). Only differences are --with-sql_compat was added to db configure, and then I created a symlink to the dbsql.h header: ln -s dbsql.h /usr/include/sqlite3.h The symlinks are already created for the binary and the libs and archive. Not sure what to do about sqlite3ext.h...looks like the contents are included directly in dbsql.h, so hope nothing in the wild tries to include it direclty. I'm going to go ahead and give it a shot and see if the browser (and everything else) handles it OK. Didn't have any problems with db-5.0.26 on my last build, but didn't try out the sql_compat. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
