On 09/22/2010 09:01 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 09/22/2010 08:33 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: >> Anybody tried DB5 in place of SQLite3? >> >> Assuming it works as advertised, any suggestions on how to handle it in >> the book? > > Yeah, bad form to reply to myself. I had just heard about this...well > just realized what I heard over a month ago. Anyway, it looks like it > is a wholesale replacement (though you can skip the sql part and build > sqlite3 separately still). Only differences are --with-sql_compat was > added to db configure, and then I created a symlink to the dbsql.h > header: ln -s dbsql.h /usr/include/sqlite3.h
Oops. I stand corrected. sqlite3.h was installed, as a copy with preserved attributes (time stamp logging was broken). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
