Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote these words on 11/09/10 14:27 CST: >> I'm looking at some of the less commonly used packages in BLFS (for >> openssl-1.0.0a), of which I think qpopper is one. > > I have never built nor used that package. If nobody can provide a sound > reason to keep it, I am in favor of its demise.
I probably put it originally in some time ago. It was the only way I knew at the time to pop email over an encrypted link (port 995). I have not used it in years as I now use gmail. If I was setting up a mail service today, I'd probably look at it first for pop3s capabilities. I did not use it with xinetd. I'm neutral on dropping it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
