Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 11/16/10 10:06 CST: > I'd prefer the smaller patch and some text mentioning the warnings.
Thanks for your input, Bruce. The only concern I have with the small patch is if someones autofoo tool chain is messed up, but that is a fairly small issue, knowing that only autoconf needs to be run. I like the big patch (less instructions), Bruce likes the small patch, and DJ wants to generate a new patch. :-) I really don't care, although Bruce's suggestion is probably best. If there are no replies (I'm sure Ken will have an opinion), then we'll go with Bruce's suggestion. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 10:48:00 up 14 days, 17:42, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.07, 0.02 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
