Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:51:54AM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: >> If there are no replies (I'm sure >> Ken will have an opinion), then we'll go with Bruce's suggestion. >> > FWIW, for this I think smaller is better.
Just to add another thought here, if a user wants to actually look at the changes instead of just blindly applying patches and building, a large patch, especially one of generated code, would be difficult or impossible to comprehend. A small patch like you just posted is very clear as to exactly what is being changed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
