> There is another problem. In the command: > > for FN in `find /usr/bin -type l`; do > if [ `readlink $FN | grep "\.\./texmf"` ]; then > ln -svf `readlink $FN | sed 's|\.\./texmf|../share/texmf|'` $FN > fi > done && > unset FN > > I get > > `/usr/bin/man' -> `../share/texmf/doc/man' > > I'll have to check, but make install may be overwriting /usr/bin/man.
Yes, this is texlive's man! Very annoying indeed. I saw packagers removing it. I'm not sure though if that breaks 'texdoc' behavior or something. I'd rather move man/ to texmf/ and remove texmf/doc/* tree completely, if safe. Maybe texdoc as well. And nasty man/man?/*.pdf files, of course, too. Texlive, being installed to /usr, overwrites many programs in /usr/bin. One example is 'psutils': if not disabled in configure, the internal version builds together with texmf stuff and goes to /usr/bin, over the installed BLFS package. Maybe there are other package conflicts, I don't know. Personally, I think texlive is a good candidate for the /opt hierarchy. /Alex. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
