DJ Lucas wrote: > Yes, I mentioned this in my crossed email message. I'm going to wait to > add that until I get the demos back into the book. Do you think it would > be better to revert to the old in the interim? There is much outdated in > the old, for instance, there is no reason to create the xorg.conf file > for 95% of users, but those instructions will work to test the system > until verification of DRI. I don't honestly see myself getting to the > demos until next weekend. I was actually thinking about adding them back > as a patch to Mesa instead of a separate package as we only install the > two files. Let me look at that quick...
I'd go ahead and add the old pages back for the week. We recommend on the website that the -dev book should be used. We can leave both old and new in for a week if you add an 'under construction' to the new page. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
