Ken Moffat wrote: > In general, BLFS avoids "development" versions of packages (with > some exceptions, e.g. mutt and now, probably, bc) so -dev is fairly > well placed for a stable system.
Yes, I've got bc ready, but even though 1.06.95 is technically not a 'stable' release, it hasn't been touched since 2006 and I think that makes it pretty stable. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
