On 12/03/2011 08:05 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > What is the purpose of the libtirpc patch? It builds fine without it on > development LFS. I notice that the rpc-headers tarball does not contain > all of the rpcsvc/ headers, is this the reason for the patch? From a > casual glance, it doesn't appear so. I don't see anything in the three > omitted files that would keep them from building (except possibly the > exclusion of<rpc/netdb.h> which I suspect is not included in<netdb.h> > on unpatched glibc). Never mind this part...I went completely stupid as to the existing patch. Next is the previously mentioned netdb.h omission. This can be fixed by getting rid of the #if 0 and corresponding #endif in tirpc/rpc/rpcent.h, but we still build time_auth.c, which without, completely separates us from glibc's rpc. It's the nis headers that we need now, are these provided by any competing implementation?
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
