On 12/03/2011 11:31 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > >> What a disaster! Even RedHat hasn't got this far yet. There is more we >> need to do to GLibc than install the headers. I'm suggesting that we >> follow suit, as the rest of the distros have, and re-export the symbols >> in LFS and continue to install the headers until a *complete* >> replacement is available. > Have you looked at glibc in the current LFS svn? Yeah, copying the headers is not quite enough. >> Also, OpenSSL will likely be a requirement soon for TI-RPC's crypto >> libs. As far as BLFS is concerned, we can make the assumption that the >> eratta was followed with the above changes made (glibc re-installed for >> people who have already built LFS-7.0), or just stick with what is there >> now and delete the static libs for TI-RPC, but that does mean that NIS >> is completely dead (and the shared TI-RPC is still potentially broken). > BLFS installs the headers if they are working from LFS7. > > Yes, NIS is broken. I don't want to tackle that until it is fixed > upstream. Does anyone still use NIS? A BLFS builder probably should > use LDAP instead. > > -- Bruce I don't particularly care about NIS myself, but libtirpc is still broken without your NIS patch, even after re-exporting the glibc symbols...specifically _des_crypt_call is still undefined.
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
