On 12/04/2011 04:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: >> On 12/03/2011 06:09 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> >>> I had noticed functions up to des_crypt.c were removed in debian, >>> and was attempting to merge their changes with yours by hand. >> Actually, removal of des_crypt.c is all that is required if we avoid >> upstream's ridiculous policy of "break stuff to light a fire under >> downstream's hind quarters" (as suggested in the cross-post to LFS-Dev). >> Once that is done, nothing is broken, and only yp* cannot be used with >> IPv6 (or libtirpc at all), but the original IPv4 implementation is left >> in working order and NFS can be left to use libtirpc (including IPv6 >> functionality with rpcbind replacing portmap) without breaking any >> existing NIS installations (they can still only use IPv4, however). >> >> IOW: what is in the BLFS book now should work fine as far as BLFS is >> concerned. We should still provide a complete reversal of the GLibc >> changes in LFS for the time being as I think that the static TI-RPC >> libraries are probably broken with auth_time.c still there, but I gave >> up trying to identify or fix it as it was easier to simply "un-break" GLibc. > I'm confused here DJ. AFAIK, the only changes to LFS svn are: > > cp -v ../glibc-2.14.1/sunrpc/rpc/*.h /usr/include/rpc > cp -v ../glibc-2.14.1/sunrpc/rpcsvc/*.h /usr/include/rpcsvc > cp -v ../glibc-2.14.1/nis/rpcsvc/*.h /usr/include/rpcsvc > > and the BLFS libtirpc instructions do basically the same thing WRT > headers if wasn't done in LFS. > > What 'reversal of the GLibc changes in LFS' are you referring to? > > -- Bruce The symbols are hidden:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.14.1/0070_all_glibc-2.14-rpc-export.patch -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
