DJ Lucas wrote: > On 01/30/2012 10:47 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote: >> Qrux schrieb: >> >>> You could include Xen. ;) And VirtualBox (though someone else would have >>> to write that bit). >> i have a machine running lfs 6.x with virtualbox. >> >> i can check against a current build (with current vb) and write a hint. >> i'm not an xml or git guru... >> >> if someone has will transfrom my scripts i can either publish them here >> or send them to the volunteer. >> >> tobias >> >> > Virtualbox requires a multi-lib system to build the guest additions. > Would it be acceptable to hack it up to not build the guest additions > for alternate arch, and distribute extracted 32 and 64 bit guest > additions from the released binaries? Does Xen has any similar requirements?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of VB over Xen and KVM? If it doesn't add any significant capabilities, I don't see the effort to make it fit into BLFS as useful. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
