On 03/25/2012 12:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> It is not buildable with libpng 1.5 ... Also, 0.16 has qt3 support. See >> if building with libpng 1.5 is fixed there. But if you are going to keep >> KDE3 (Trinity), we could also keep GNOME2 (MATE) too, don't you say? I >> say it's stupid to maintain two versions of them in the book, even if >> it's developed by someone else. It's history - I doubt anyone will add >> any new features except maybe bugfixes. > Perhaps we should consider dropping Trinity from the book. It seems to > be more effort than it's worth. We don't want to keep multiple versions > of packages just to support Trinity -- especially since KDE4 is now in > the book. > > I think I'm the only one who has used Trinity. Are there others? > > -- Bruce >
As you may well know I have used trinity quite a lot, and I will vote for dropping trinity. I have switched back to KDE4 and it seems to work well for me now. I have dropped out of the trinity arch linux team as well. Trinity offers nothing new and is not making good progress going forward. Trinity still has problems existing with other desktop environments. For me to recommend trinity it would need to install into /usr and have no issues using QT4 apps, in my opinion I don't think they are going to get there anytime soon and I am not going to wait as KDE4 is making good progress. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
