baho Utot wrote: > On 03/25/2012 12:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >>> It is not buildable with libpng 1.5 ... Also, 0.16 has qt3 support. See >>> if building with libpng 1.5 is fixed there. But if you are going to keep >>> KDE3 (Trinity), we could also keep GNOME2 (MATE) too, don't you say? I >>> say it's stupid to maintain two versions of them in the book, even if >>> it's developed by someone else. It's history - I doubt anyone will add >>> any new features except maybe bugfixes. >> Perhaps we should consider dropping Trinity from the book. It seems to >> be more effort than it's worth. We don't want to keep multiple versions >> of packages just to support Trinity -- especially since KDE4 is now in >> the book. >> >> I think I'm the only one who has used Trinity. Are there others? >> >> -- Bruce >> > > As you may well know I have used trinity quite a lot, and I will vote > for dropping trinity. > > I have switched back to KDE4 and it seems to work well for me now. > I have dropped out of the trinity arch linux team as well. Trinity > offers nothing new and is not making good progress going forward. > Trinity still has problems existing with other desktop environments. > For me to recommend trinity it would need to install into /usr and have > no issues using QT4 apps, in my opinion I don't think they are going to > get there anytime soon and I am not going to wait as KDE4 is making good > progress.
It was a good idea, but I don't think the Trinity team has the resources to manage the large set of packages there. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
