Armin K. wrote: > On 03/31/2012 07:04 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:55:40 +0100 >> Bruce Dubbs<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Easy guys. I can see both sides here, but tend to agree with Andy. If >>> a package can be used by Gimp (directly or indirectly), then it's not >>> Gnome specific any more, even though it may have started out that way. >>> >>> It appears that libsoup has been reverted. >> Indeed. The required dependencies now reflect what is actually required >> but Armin's left --disable-gnome from the default configure options. >> It's a compromise. >> >> Andy > > It is too "risky" to put it there by default. As I said, twenty packages > against one always win - and they all require libsoup-gnome. But command > is there in explanation, and has been said to add it if gnome isn't > intended to be built later on.
I like that compromise. Good job. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
