On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:22:27 +0100 Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> As at 29th Feb (last time I updated my LFS repo) LFS was overriding > libexecdir for the following packages: coreutils, findutils, gawk, > gcc, glibc, inetutils, man-db, tar, udev. Inetutils is probably a > special case. > > Or, are we now saying that in BLFS we'll go with /usr/libexec and > prefer what we hope will be in the new fhs, but that LFS will stay > with the old fhs and therefore continue to go out of its way to > prevent /usr/libexec being created ? Well LFS is a bit different because of the case of booting a system where / may be on a separate partition. So udev can't use /usr/libexec and maybe some of the others are needed by the bootscripts? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
