On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:36:49 +0100
"Armin K." <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not agree with /usr/libexec stuff ... I'd agree if it only
> installed executables there, or even better -
> /usr/libexec/package/{executable1,executable2,etc} ... But no, it
> installs also directories there, too which is sort of mess ... And yet
> some more stuff ... Some (well, at least most of gnome) packages install
> files in /usr/lib/package and /usr/libexec/package, and I'd rather keep
> it in one directory. Anyways, if there are only executables installed, I
> recommend moving them in /usr/bin or /usr/sbin (depends on how it would
> be run).
/usr/bin or /usr/sbin will never be acceptable. The point of
/usr/libexec is it's a place to put executables that are not in your
${PATH} because they're not supposed to be run by users, they're called
run by other executables.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
