[]s, Fernando de Oliveira Natal, RN, BRAZIL
--- Em sáb, 28/4/12, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] sane and xsane > Para: "BLFS Development List" <[email protected]> > Data: Sábado, 28 de Abril de 2012, 17:20 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > > Not important, in sane page you have: > > > > install -m 644 -v (backends) > > install -v -m644 (frontends) > > There are several types of options, Unix, bsd, and > long. See the man page for > ps or man 3 getopt. IN this case, these are unix > options that start with a > dash. The space after a unix option is optional. > For bsd options it is > mandatory and for long options an '=' is required. > > > > I'm not sure if this will make any difference: the > "space" between m and 644, > > above, removed in my script. > > No, no difference. > > > I had to disable png support for xsane: > > > >> xsane-save.c:4772:9: warning: pointer targets in > passing argument 5 of ‘png_set_ > >> iCCP’ differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign] > >> /usr/include/libpng15/png.h:2276:1: note: expected > ‘png_const_bytep’ but argument is of type ‘gchar *’ > >> xsane-save.c: In function ‘xsane_save_png’: > >> xsane-save.c:4836:7: error: dereferencing pointer > to incomplete type > >> xsane-save.c: In function ‘xsane_save_png_16’: > >> xsane-save.c:5029:7: error: dereferencing pointer > to incomplete type > >> make[1]: ** [xsane-save.o] Erro 1 > >> make[1]: Saindo do diretório > `/media/dados/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2012.04.28/xsane-0.994/src' > >> make: ** [all-recursive] Erro 1 > > > > I am using libpng-1.5.10 with apng patch. Build > completed after I used --disable-png in configure. > > Which version? It may not matter because the most > recent version is about 18 > months old. Libpng 1.5.10 - March 29, 2012 (apparently, this is the release date). > > > Worst of all, I cannot help you: xsane could not find a > "dispositivo" (device?). > > Maintaining sane/xsane in BLFS may just be more effort than > it's worth. > I do not yet feel confident enough to replace my host by LFS. Did it in another machime (LFS6.7), but it was a PITA, regarding NVidea, Broadcom and VMware, worse yet when upgrading the kernel, NV and VM had to be taken into account and reconfigured (this is not the best word, hope you understand) of course more a problem of these than LFS/BLFS. But I will try to learn jhalfs (remember?) in some days maybe weeks, make a partition in the host for LFS and then I will be able to help more. My intention and goal is to eventually leave other distribuitions just to follow and see what is happening, and rely entirelly in LFS/BLFS even as host. So, please, do not give up. People like me would have much more difficulty to achieve such a goal (see above) if packages so important as xsane/sane keep being dropped from the book. Thanks, Bruce Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
