> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote: >>> BLFS updated LLVM to Version 3.1 on May 26th, 2012. I compiled LLVM 3.1 >>> successfully, but compiling MesaLib failed. The code snippets at the end >>> of this message show why: LLVM has changed a function definition >>> incompatibly from v3.0 to v3.1 but MesaLib is using the old version >>> (even in version 8.0.3). As long as MesaLib doesn't know differences in >>> LLVM 3.x versions BLFS shouldn't go past LLVM 3.0. >>> In my opinion MesaLib is be the most important user of LLVM in the >>> context of BLFS ; the gallium drivers for ATI/AMD-chips need it. >> >> It looks like it's being addressed in Mesalib, e.g. >> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-commit/2012-May/036915.html >> >> I'd rather patch Mesalib than revert llvm and then update both later. > > See if this patch works for you. > > https://417363.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=313071 I compiled and installed LLVM 3.1 and MesaLib 8.0.2 yesterday evening, using the patch. System is running as usual. Thanks.
Klaus Wulff -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
