Bruce Dubbs wrote: > lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote: >> BLFS updated LLVM to Version 3.1 on May 26th, 2012. I compiled LLVM 3.1 >> successfully, but compiling MesaLib failed. The code snippets at the end >> of this message show why: LLVM has changed a function definition >> incompatibly from v3.0 to v3.1 but MesaLib is using the old version >> (even in version 8.0.3). As long as MesaLib doesn't know differences in >> LLVM 3.x versions BLFS shouldn't go past LLVM 3.0. >> In my opinion MesaLib is be the most important user of LLVM in the >> context of BLFS ; the gallium drivers for ATI/AMD-chips need it. > > It looks like it's being addressed in Mesalib, e.g. > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-commit/2012-May/036915.html > > I'd rather patch Mesalib than revert llvm and then update both later.
See if this patch works for you. https://417363.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=313071 -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
