I was able to build and test openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream.
I used: #!/bin/bash export DISPLAY=:20 Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac& echo $!> Xvfb.pid make jtregcheck -k 2>jdktest-errs |tee jdktest kill -9 `cat Xvfb.pid` unset DISPLAY rm -f Xvfb.pid There were several lines in jdktest-errs like WARNING: Path does not exist as file or directory: Makefile:205: Extraneous text after `ifeq' directive xxx uses or overrides a deprecated API Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. I just don't think a package as important as java should have those types of errors/warnings in their test suite. The tests themselves were: --------------- jtreg console summary for hotspot --------------- Test results: passed: 154 --------------- jtreg console summary for jdk --------------- Test results: passed: 4,052; failed: 33; error: 2 --------------- jtreg console summary for langtools --------------- Test results: passed: 1,938 So here is 35 errors out of about 7000 tests. Workable, but not impressive. Tests like com/oracle/security/ucrypto/TestAES.java should not be screen or disk sensitive. It doesn't really say why it failed, but just that it threw an exception. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
