First, thank you very much for the page upgrade. Looks very good. Em 13-08-2012 13:16, Ragnar Thomsen escreveu: > On Friday 10 August 2012 20:41:47 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> The important differences with previous version 3.5.5.3 are: >> >> --without-krb5 \ >> --without-gssapi && >> >> I do not have them installed. (previous versions did not need these >> switches) and failed to build with system poppler: >> >> #--with-system-poppler > > Thanks for your input, Fernando.
You're welcome! Just trying to contribute as much as I can. > I have commited LO 3.6.0. Like you, I > couldn't get LO to build with system Poppler. I tried both version 0.20.2 and > 0.20.3. It's a unit test (sdext_pdfimport.test) that fails, but the error > message isn't particularly helpful: > > ..... > tests.cxx:132:Assertion > Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_18PDFITestE::testXPDFParser > assertion failed > - Expression: rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.X1,34.7 ) && > rtl::math: > :approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.Y1,386.0) && > rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlin > kBounds.X2,166.7) && rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.Y2,406.2) > - Correct hyperlink bounding box > ..... > > I couldn't find any useful info on this on the web, so I decided to use the > internal copy of Poppler for now. I will keep watching for solutions for this, too. > Concerning krb5 and gssapi, I don't have them either, but the "without" > switches weren't necessary. I have to install LO-3.6.0 in four other machines, will test again. > I also included a patch to fix building with Boost 1.50. Will upgrade boost (and poppler and CUPS) before installing, and use the patch. >> About version: it is my fault that we are using four digit version. I >> have seen a distro that does like that, but can't remember which one. >> The LO site has: "This release is bit-for-bit identical to the 3.6.0 >> Release Candidate 4, so you don't need to download or reinstall if you >> have that version already." Therefore, even if it is not strictly wrong, >> I believe, we should change (as my mind has already) to using 3.6.0 >> version, instead of 3.6.0.4, which seems to refer to a specific release >> candidate, not version. > > I agree with you on this, so I removed the last ".4". Thanks for that, too. > I don't have CUPS, so I built with --disable-cups. Now, if someone with CUPS > 1.6+ could test building LO... I still have to get CUPS running in the Non-virtual machine. In the others, I can test, using *buntu as host. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
