On 07/15/2013 09:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: > >> Dunno, it was between me and Andy back then. Someone was testing JHALFS >> with BLFS and stumbled upon introspection issue due to it being >> recommended for one but not on another. Maybe when LFS 7.2 was released? >> Or some time arround when I put GNOME 3.4 into the book. > > Well I've always liked the Recommended section with short phrases about > why they are recommended. The instructions then assume the > recommendations are followed. > > Do we want to go back to that now? If so, I'd only want to do it on a > as-needed basis. There are still a ton of packages with it. > > -- Bruce >
We can do that if others agree. I admit I don't like the current instructions, and having g-i recommended won't hurt anyone. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
