Armin K. wrote: > On 07/15/2013 09:08 PM, Igor Živković wrote: >> On 07/15/2013 08:24 PM, Armin K. wrote: >>> >>> And to clarify, we don't break other packages. Disabling this by default >>> would break some GNOME packages and that's not what I want. For those >>> who are not building GNOME, we explain how to omit it. Deps were listed >>> as recommended once, but as I mentioned, I was somehow "forced" to make >>> it like this just for the sake of "I hate GNOME, I don't want the >>> components it requires as recommended". That's why I created the >>> "Optional (Required for GNOME)" dependency listing but we agreed not to >>> disable anything by default that other package might need. >> >> I'd rather note them as recommended then but if you discussed it already >> it's ok by me. >> > > As I said, they were recommended, but then someone complained and we > came to an agreement not to list them as recommended, but also not to > disable them by default.
I'm looking for that conversation but can't find it. Do you remember about when it occurred? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
