Em 31-07-2013 19:16, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:41:55PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >>> >>> I'd rather archive Gnucash then keep all the old libraries. Your call. >> >> I'm leaning that way too. We can put it back when the package gets >> caught up. Ken? >> >> -- Bruce >> > You'll upset Fernando. If it wasn't for him, I think we would have > dropped it more than a year ago. I've never worked out how to use it > (double-entry bookkeeping isn't something I understand). > > ĸen >
Thank you very much, Ken. Yes, it is essential for me. However, IIRC, gnucash-2.8 will only be released next year, hopefully dropping libgnomeui dependency. Also, the instructions in the book do not work perfectly, some features are not available, although only a few that I use is not there. It is related to the need for guile 1.8, Armin's patch partially corrects for guile 2. In Arch, Furthermore, all those old gnome just for this, do not seem fair to the book and editors. Things have changed very much since I was arguing for keeping in the book. And gnucash did not. Thus, I cannot argue with that, it is not reasonable, any more, I still will use it, though, but I think now I am more capable of finding out how to do almost without help. This was what worried me, not being possible to ask help for it here. And perhaps even out of the book, probably I will get help here with it, if necessary. Would like to ask, if possible, a link to the archived gnome and gnucash, after removed from the book. Please, in the future, do not be upset if I try to convince some editor to bring it back, in case the dependencies become reasonable. Finally, want to thank Armin for the patch and support, till now for this and Ken, who in many occasions supported it too. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
