Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:20:28AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> OK, I just rebuilt LFS in my sandbox with the new packages. It was >> extremely clean. I had no FAILs at all and The only Errors were from glibc: >> >> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-getaddrinfo4.out] Error 1 >> make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) >> make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/conform/run-conformtest.out] Error 1 >> (ignored) >> >> OTOH, I understand the concerns. I'll revert what I did in my sandbox >> and rebuild and from that do -rc2. I will still take the advice in >> Chapter 3: >> >> "The Linux kernel is updated relatively often, many times due to >> discoveries of security vulnerabilities. The latest available 3.10.x >> kernel version should be used" >> >> -- Bruce > > In -rc2 I had my normal fails in binutils and parts of gcc (that > was with my usual "set CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and sweep the static libs > under the carpet, also build using all CPUs" variant. My glibc > results looked like yours. > > Anyway, I've now completed my normal desktop on x86_64 with intel > graphics. In case there is any doubt, I am standing by everything I > tagged for 7.4 in -rc1, with the exception of two packages (elfutils > and the ati video driver) that I only build on desktops with an ATI > video chip. From here it is looking very good. > > Thanks for your work in identifying the i686 problem.
That was Fernando. I think him for spotting the problem. With everyone's help, we can get out a good release. I'm especially happy with everyone's contributions to BLFS. I think it will be a major accomplishment if we can get out the first stable BLFS release since August 2008. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
